Garrett & Pakko (2009) - Revision history

Paul Herring at 13:44, 3 July 2012

2012-07-03T13:44:32Z

Paul Herring at 10:36, 23 March 2012

2012-03-23T10:36:18Z

Paul Herring at 01:51, 23 March 2012

2012-03-23T01:51:40Z

Paul Herring: 1 revision: Imported from antiantismoking.wikia.com

2012-03-23T00:34:38Z

1 revision: Imported from antiantismoking.wikia.com

Paul Herring: Created page with "Media:The_Revenue_Performance_of_Casinos_2009-027.pdf was a study of the effect of a smoking ban in Illinois after their smoking ban in private casinos (July 2007) comparing ..."

2012-03-19T20:04:14Z

Created page with "Media:The_Revenue_Performance_of_Casinos_2009-027.pdf was a study of the effect of a smoking ban in Illinois after their smoking ban in private casinos (July 2007) comparing ..."

New page

[[Media:The_Revenue_Performance_of_Casinos_2009-027.pdf]] was a study of the effect of a smoking ban in Illinois after their smoking ban in private casinos (July 2007) comparing those with similar casinos in neighbouring states which did not have a smoking ban in private casinos.

Comparisons were made between revenues (both for the casinos themselves, and the local government from gaming taxes,) footfall, and potential migration of customers between neighbouring states.

The revenues were used to guage whether those smokers who stayed in Illinois spent less as a result of having to go outside.

Footfall was used to guage whether smoking patrons preferred to travel out of state so they could smoke while gambling.

The use of in- and out-of-state casinos also provided controls against exceptional weather events, seasonality, and more importantly, general economic conditions.

The conclusion was that Illinois casinos lost 20% growth in 2008 after the[[File:Garrettpakkofig3.png|thumb|Garrett & Pakko (2009) Fig 3]] smoking ban while the neighbouring states grew between 3% and 6% (Figure 3 from page 32 of the report.)
[[Category:Research]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 The conclusion was that Illinois casinos lost 20% growth in 2008 after the[[File:Garrettpakkofig3.png|thumb|Garrett & Pakko (2009) Fig 3]] smoking ban while the neighbouring states grew between 3% and 6% (Figure 3 from page 32 of the report.)
 [[Category:Research]]
 [[Category:Smoking]]
 [[Category:Gambling]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 23 March 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	The conclusion was that Illinois casinos lost 20% growth in 2008 after the[[File:Garrettpakkofig3.png\|thumb\|Garrett & Pakko (2009) Fig 3]] smoking ban while the neighbouring states grew between 3% and 6% (Figure 3 from page 32 of the report.)		The conclusion was that Illinois casinos lost 20% growth in 2008 after the[[File:Garrettpakkofig3.png\|thumb\|Garrett & Pakko (2009) Fig 3]] smoking ban while the neighbouring states grew between 3% and 6% (Figure 3 from page 32 of the report.)
	[[Category:Research]]		[[Category:Research]]
		+	[[Category:Smoking]]
		+	[[Category:Gambling]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 23 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[Media:The_Revenue_Performance_of_Casinos_2009-027.pdf]] was a study of the effect of a smoking ban in Illinois after their smoking ban in private casinos (July 2007) comparing those with similar casinos in neighbouring states which did not have a smoking ban in private casinos.	+	[[Media:The_Revenue_Performance_of_Casinos_2009-027.pdf\|The Revenue Performance of Casinos]] was a study of the effect of a smoking ban in Illinois after their smoking ban in private casinos (July 2007) comparing those with similar casinos in neighbouring states which did not have a smoking ban in private casinos.

	Comparisons were made between revenues (both for the casinos themselves, and the local government from gaming taxes,) footfall, and potential migration of customers between neighbouring states.		Comparisons were made between revenues (both for the casinos themselves, and the local government from gaming taxes,) footfall, and potential migration of customers between neighbouring states.