J Padilla & N Watson (2008) - Revision history

Paul Herring at 13:46, 3 July 2012

2012-07-03T13:46:01Z

Paul Herring at 10:37, 23 March 2012

2012-03-23T10:37:24Z

Paul Herring: 2 revisions: Imported from antiantismoking.wikia.com

2012-03-23T00:34:33Z

2 revisions: Imported from antiantismoking.wikia.com

Paul Herring: Adding categories

2012-03-12T19:30:55Z

Adding categories

Paul Herring: Created page with " ''A Critical Review Of The Literature On Generic Packaging For Cigarettes'', commissioned for Phillip Morris Internat..."

2012-03-12T19:30:02Z

Created page with " ''A Critical Review Of The Literature On Generic Packaging For Cigarettes'', commissioned for Phillip Morris Internat..."

New page

''[[Media:LECG_Literature_Review_on_generic_packaging.pdf|A Critical Review Of The Literature On Generic Packaging For Cigarettes]]'', commissioned for Phillip Morris International (PMI), by The Law and Economics Consulting Group(LECG) to review:

: from a technical perspective, ten studies based on original empirical research on the issue of generic packaging of cigarettes. The selection of papers was based on a thorough review of documents discussing generic packaging as a tobacco control measure carried out by Shook Hardy & Bacon, a law firm commissioned by PMI.
All of the surveys reviewed purported, at least in part, to view the impact of plain packaging would have on teenager's inclination to take up smoking.

In considering whether the conclusions of the studies, in general, were accurate, it was stated that

: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ''[[Media:LECG_Literature_Review_on_generic_packaging.pdf|A Critical Review Of The Literature On Generic Packaging For Cigarettes]]'', commissioned for Phillip Morris International (PMI), by The Law and Economics Consulting Group(LECG) to review:
-: from a technical perspective, ten studies based on original empirical research on the issue of generic packaging of cigarettes. The selection of papers was based on a thorough review of documents discussing generic packaging as a tobacco control measure carried out by Shook Hardy & Bacon, a law firm commissioned by PMI.
+{{quote|from a technical perspective, ten studies based on original empirical research on the issue of generic packaging of cigarettes. The selection of papers was based on a thorough review of documents discussing generic packaging as a tobacco control measure carried out by Shook Hardy & Bacon, a law firm commissioned by PMI.
-All of the surveys reviewed purported, at least in part, to view the impact of plain packaging would have on teenager's inclination to take up smoking.
+All of the surveys reviewed purported, at least in part, to view the impact of plain packaging would have on teenager's inclination to take up smoking.}}
 In considering whether the conclusions of the studies, in general, were accurate, it was stated that
-: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]
+{{quote|From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]}}
 [[Category:Research]]
 [[Category:Smoking]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 23 March 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]		: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]
	[[Category:Research]]		[[Category:Research]]
		+	[[Category:Smoking]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 12 March 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]		: From our review of the studies, we conclude that they do not provide a reliable answer on the existence of a causal link between branded cigarette packaging and youth initiation to smoking. The reason is that they have limitations both in terms of the data analysis and data collection methods.5 These limitations are so fundamental that conclusions derived on the relationship between cigarette packaging and youth smoking are likely to be misleading.[Page 9]
		+	[[Category:Research]]