Difference between revisions of "Passive Smoking"
Paul Herring (talk | contribs) |
Paul Herring (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
: While acknowledging Mr Labate’s exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and finding no other cause for his lung cancer, the Medical Committee in its decision nonetheless stated that it could not establish with certainty the connection with his professional activities. The Commission accordingly denied the request, following the finding by the Medical Committee that the connection between the disease and Mr Labate’s professional activities was not sufficiently established. | : While acknowledging Mr Labate’s exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and finding no other cause for his lung cancer, the Medical Committee in its decision nonetheless stated that it could not establish with certainty the connection with his professional activities. The Commission accordingly denied the request, following the finding by the Medical Committee that the connection between the disease and Mr Labate’s professional activities was not sufficiently established. | ||
− | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Smoking]] |
Revision as of 11:02, 23 March 2012
Passive Smoking is a general catch-all phrase that attempts to descibe the adsorbtion or absorbtion of the by-products of smoking by people and/or things other than the active smoker, usually with alleged deleterious effects.
For example, in the case of Second Hand Smoke, smoke from both the end of a lit ciggarette, and that exhaled by the active smoker, may be inhaled by near-by people, or may settle on inanimate objects directly near-by.
In the case of Third Hand Smoke, the by-products that settle on inanimate objects that subequently metamorphoses into other by-products.
No-one, yet, has seriously accused 'Fourth Hand Smoke' of causing harm, though it has been half-jokenly referred to as, among other things:
- smoke exposure resulting from being in the presence of someone who themselves was in the presence of a smoker.[1]
- when a person is forced to listen to someone complaining about how their friend’s clothes smelled of smoke from being at a bar the night before[2]
- the presence in the family home, domicile or dwelling place (this includes motor vehicles some of which retain mobility) of unopened, un-smoked cigarettes contained in a pack, or individual cigarettes bought from less than reputable corner stores that are contained in re-sealable Ziploc bags[3]
Higher degrees of smokiness, have predictably been cited, usually in the same manner as Fouth Hand Smoke above.
On a more serious note, most mention of secondary smoke, when referred to by the anti-smokers, is usually accompanied by grisly descriptions of what may/will/has happened to 'victims' of it. These descriptions are usually worse than the symptoms attributable to 'First Hand Smoke,' somehow implying that the effects of SHS are of an order worse and totally different.
That the smoker themselves is also exposed to this second/third/fourth hand smoke, as well as the first hand smoke, and seem to suffer none of these effects is casually not mentioned.
Sadly, while there are few, if any, documentated cases of people seriously suffering from SHS (asthma suffers susceptable to 'smoke' are susceptable to a lot of things for example) there are quite a few documentated cases of people dying or suffering severe injury due do policies put in place to 'protect' people from SHS.
Second Hand Smoke
No-one has died from SHS.[4]
Despite all the articles you can find on the web citing the horrors of second hand smoke, not one person has had SHS cited as the reason for death.
Mario Labate's widow, despite his working in an office for 29 years exposed to a large amount of secondhand tobacco smoke, and subsequently died from lung cancer, failed to get the cause of death recorded as SHS[5], with the court recording:
- While acknowledging Mr Labate’s exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and finding no other cause for his lung cancer, the Medical Committee in its decision nonetheless stated that it could not establish with certainty the connection with his professional activities. The Commission accordingly denied the request, following the finding by the Medical Committee that the connection between the disease and Mr Labate’s professional activities was not sufficiently established.
References
- ↑ http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/11/article-warns-of-dangers-of-fourth-hand.html
- ↑ http://www.holyjuan.com/2009/01/4th-hand-smoke-found-to-be-cause-of-ear.html
- ↑ http://www.thesharkguys.com/mad-science/third-hand-smoke-beware-the-dangers-of-fourth-hand-smoke/
- ↑ http://www.davehitt.com/2004/name_three.html
- ↑ http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=F-77/07