Difference between revisions of "Wakefield, Hayes, Durkin, and Borland (2013)"
Paul Herring (talk | contribs) |
Paul Herring (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Clearly, the implication that everyone who thinks about quitting, [[Stated preferences do not align with revealed preferences|actually does]], is nonsense. | Clearly, the implication that everyone who thinks about quitting, [[Stated preferences do not align with revealed preferences|actually does]], is nonsense. | ||
| + | The fact that these numbers equate to | ||
| + | {{quote2|57.1% of those smoking from branded packs were "seriously considering quitting in the next 6 months", whereas this rose to 68.8% for those smoking from plain packs.<ref>[http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/that-plain-packaging-study.html That plain packaging study ] - Velvet Glove, Iron Fist blog</ref> }} | ||
== Authors == | == Authors == | ||
Revision as of 13:36, 23 July 2013
A rather one-sided review of the Australian [plain packaging] experiment entitled Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study, notoriously used as proof of success in since one of its conclusions was
(smokers on plain packs) were more likely to have thought about quitting at least once a day in the past week (AdjOR=1.81, p=0.013) and to rate quitting as a higher priority in their lives (F=13.11, df=1, p<0.001).
Clearly, the implication that everyone who thinks about quitting, actually does, is nonsense.
The fact that these numbers equate to
57.1% of those smoking from branded packs were "seriously considering quitting in the next 6 months", whereas this rose to 68.8% for those smoking from plain packs.[1]
Authors
References
- ↑ That plain packaging study - Velvet Glove, Iron Fist blog